Mark Charan Newton

Mark Charan Newton header image

Road to Publication, Part Two

February 20th, 2008 · 3 Comments

Continuing the path to publication discussion, here’s the follow up from having an idea of the types of books that sell.

Now you’ve written something. You’ve chucked out your TV, trimmed your social life so you can get things down on paper. It’s a full novel now, not a patchwork of ideas. It’s all the way through. Written to the best of your ability. You’ve put it away and come back to it with fresh eyes to rewrite the damn thing. Hopefully, it’ll be a good way to being what publishers want to buy. So what the hell do you do?

Well firstly, there are some final things. Make sure it’s formatted well—double spacing, in a decent font. Run a spell check over it. Get a synopsis together. Some might say that’s as hard as the actual writing. Have some points in mind about what (current) books you can compare yours to. Think in terms of marketing.

Next: find a list of agents. Literary agents are essential. Most publishers won’t even look at submissions that don’t come from agents. It wouldn’t be possible to operate otherwise. Get a copy of The Writers’ And Artists’ Yearbook. In there you should find a listing of agents by the genre they represent. Not every one will represent SF and Fantasy. Find those that do. Write to them, with a covering letter, with a brief outline of your work and if they’d like to see it. Keep it polite and simple. Remember, it’s a business, so act professionally.

Maybe they’ll ask to see your work—great, send it on as required. You should know your market, know the kind of readers your book will appeal to. Now, prepare to be rejected. It’ll happen. Get used to it. Don’t be so arrogant to believe your work is genius, because there are many that do! If you’re not like this, then you’ll be able to modify your book, work on your writing.

When you get to this stage, resist temptation to self publish. In my opinion, this is sinful. I think it’s terrible the way self-publishing imprints rip-off people, play on their emotions, so that anyone can publish their book. Anyone! The main issue I have is that as a writer you have no one to edit, no one to give feedback. Why’s this important? Because you improve as a writer, and you improve as a person. (Although self-publishing can be good for obscure types of books, especially local ones that aren’t going to be commercial at all.)

If an agent gets back to you negatively, move on. Learn from your mistakes. Maybe your writing isn’t quite right—work on it. Listen to advice. Study other authors. Look at how they piece a novel together. Read. Look at their style. Look at how the plot is formulated. There are a billion things you can learn from reading with a keen eye. It isn’t easy. Some people might never get there, but you don’t know unless you try, do you? 

And if the agent gets back with a positive—listen to them. They know what they’re talking about. (Note: never pay an agent upfront. I’d be asking some serious questions if they wanted cash.)

I felt lucky when I signed with John Jarrold. I sent him some material when he was starting out as an agent. He got back to me immediately with praise and acceptance. I felt like a fraud at the time, knowing next to nothing about the publishing world, but what the heck, I had a great agent. I went with it. And I didn’t get published right away. I had the heart-breaking journey navigating around ‘marketing departments’ and their requirements. It took a couple of years to get things right, but I couldn’t have done it without listening to John’s advice.  So in my case, after one unpublished novel (that has remained so), one that has been sold to a small press, and the third attempt to Macmillan, I finally got there.

I guess the advice I’d have is to work really hard at it, remain professional, and find out as much as you can about the industry. Don’t assume you know too much. I’ve only been in the trade for a few years, and I’m frequently suprised by things…

Oh, and if you find it hard, join a writing group. They’re great for moral and support. Plus you realise you’re not alone! 

If anyone wants to chat some more, drop me a line on here or on one of the social networks to the right. I’m more than happy to keep a debate going. 

Tags: discussions · publishing · writing

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Part-time Punk // Feb 20, 2008 at 9:47 pm

    Something I’ve been meaning to blog about for a while now (aside from the tedious booksellers in uniforms thing currently sweeping mainstreet Britain), is the difference in stance between independent musicians (i.e. those who essentially self-publish their own music) and self-publishing authors. Yes, 99% of anything will be crap, but the consensus (as you hint at in your post) is that self-publishing is frowned upon to the extent that it should only be considered for the most niche of publications. Why should that be the case? Is there not an argument for the more avant-garde stuff to be self-published? Word of mouth is as valid here as it is in the independent music scene, but as with double barrelled Home Counties names and working ‘free’ for a year to get your foot in the door, it seems publishing isn’t quite up to speed with other creative industries in many respects.

  • 2 Mark Newton // Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 pm

    Hi Rob,

    Let me think: it’s late so this could be rambling and incoherent.

    Yes, it’s a tricky one, isn’t it, but book publishing and music just aren’t the same industries. Generally speaking, you need to be able to connect words well to be a good writer, even an average one. From bestselling mush to arty stuff, you need a good grasp of language. I would say that people who can write well WILL be picked up by publishers at some point, that’s a fact. It might take some time, but it can happen.

    Editors want to break new things as well as having a safety net. In fact, the big sellers help fund more experimental works. It’s a myth that publishing is totally about money. Readers are smart; a publisher would be a fool to keep ignoring that they want new stuff too.

    Also, a great percentage of readers like to be shown what kind of book to read - be it in recommendations on TV/blurbs on the book / packaging that’s similar. They’ve read something they like, and want something that was a bit like it. That’s why genres exist.

    When I worked in the book trade, we frowned a lot on self published authors. Back then, the books were poor quality and every one I saw was terribly written. It was horrible self indulgent stuff. Not always the case, I admit. It had a stigma to it.

    Another thing: music is quick - to wrap up a tune, burn it to disc etc., to even gig, and note crowd reactions. Writing is slow, much slower. Great works may take generations to be realised.

    What ordinary readers might not realise is the editorial input and guidance that goes into most publications. A self published author will not get that critical feedback, will not have a need to improve as a writer, will likely get no better than they are. Then they could be stuck publishing their own titles indefinitely, and not get a wide readership. I would say the aim for most writers is to be read by many people. Publishing is a business. Even experimental publishers like P.S. Publishing require high quality writers, not just anyone.

    It is an interesting debate, and if it wasn’t so late I’d give a more thought-out response. Maybe if you find me at a convention bar, I’ll answer better! Mine’s a Guinness…

  • 3 Road to Publication, Part One // Feb 25, 2008 at 7:12 pm

    […] ← Fairtrade Fortnight Road to Publication, Part Two […]

Leave a Comment